👉 Some most important Judgments related to 125 Cr.P.C. 👈

1. 125 CrPC cannot be filed twice, only 127 CrPC is allowed. (High Court Gujrat), Bench Hbl J. M. R. Shah, Order on 30-08-2011, Cr RA/69/2011 8/8, Revision Appeal No. 69 of 2011, Chauhan Anjanaben Jayantibhai Vs Chauhan Kanaiyalal Mohanlal.(Chauhan vs Chauhan)

 

2. No Multiple maintenances are allowed. (High Court Gujrat), Bench Hbl J. Akhil Kureshi, order on 21-10-2010, Special Appeal No. 2080 of 2010, SCR. A/2080/2010, 2/2, Hemlataben Maheshbhai Chauhan Vs State of Gujarat.

 

3. Multiple petitions of maintenance are not allowed. (High Court Delhi), Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order on 30-08-10, Crl. M. C. No. 130/2010 and Crl. M. A. No. 504/2010, Rachna Kathuria vs Ramesh Kathuria. Citation No. 173 (2010) DLT 289.

 

4. Double Jeopardy. Same relief of maintenance cannot be asked twice in two different courts. Litigant cannot ride two horses. (High Court Mumbai), Bench Hbl B. Wahane, J. Order on 17-07-1991. Ravindra Haribhau Karmarkar Vs Mrs. Shaila R. Karmarkar. Citation No. 1992 Cri LJ 1845.

 

5. Separate income of wife can be taken in to account in determining the amount of maintenance payable to her. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl JJ. Sarkaria R. Singh, Chandrachud Y.V., Gupta A.C., Order on 17-10-1974, Bhagwan Dutt Vs Kamla Devi and Ors. Citation Nos. 1975 AIR 83; 1975 SCR (2) 483; 1975 SCC (2) 386; Citator R 1986 SC 984 (5), R 1987 SC 1100 (5).

 

6. No parallel 125CrPC and DVA for maintenance. (High Court Delhi), Bench Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order on 22-09-2010, Crl. R. P. No. 633 of 2010, Crl M. A. No. 15451/ 2010, Renu Mittal Vs Anil Mittal & Ors. Citation No. 173 (2010) DLT 269.

 

7. Interim maintenance increase illegal. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl JJ. B.N. Agarwal and G. S. Singhvi, Order on 23-02-2009, Civil Appeal No. 1163/2009, SLP (C) No. 16742 of 2006, Sanjeev Gupta Vs Salini Gupta. Citation No. 2009 INSC 390 (23 February 2009); II (2012 DMC 705.

 

8. Claim of high status of husband is not sufficient for interim maintenance. (High Court Delhi), Bench Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhigra, order on 01-09-2010, Crl M. C. No. 4066 of 2009 and Crl. M. A. No. 13807 of 2009, Amit Khanna Vs Priyanka Khanna.

 

9. Interim Maintenance cannot be increased based on husband salary hike. (High Court Mumbai), Bench Hbl R. S. Dalvi, J. order 26-02-2010, W. P. No. 6686 of 2009, Ritula Singh Vs Lt. Col. Rajeswar Singh.

 

10. Children can claim maintenance from mother. Punishment awarded U/s 193 IPC to wife for providing false evidence to the court. (High Court Delhi), Hbl J. Dr.S. Murlidharan, order on 23-03-2009, Crl. M. C. 1130/2008 & Crl. M. A. 4231/ 2008, Jagdish Prasad Vs State of NCT Delhi & Ors.

 

11. Maintenance arrears of one year only from the date of filing the petition. (High Court AP), Hbl D.J. Raju, J., order on 31 March 1984, Jangam Srinivasa Rao Vs Jangam Rajeswari & ors. Citation No. 1990 Cri LJ 2506.

 

12. Take EMI into consideration in maintenance and reduced maintenance. (Supreme Court), Hbl A. Kabir and C. Joseph, JJ., order on 28-08-2009, Crl Appeal No. 879 of 2009, Arising on SLP ( Crl.) No. 7503 of 2008, SLP (Crl.) No. 7924 of 2008, Bhushan Kumar Meen Vs Mansi Meen @ Harpreet Kaur. Citation Nos. (2010) 15 SCC 372 A; (2010) 15 SCC 372 B.

 

13. Wife cannot take advantage of two orders of maintenance passed by civil as well as criminal court. (HC Maharastra), Bench Hbl R. Lodha J., order on 13-09-1995, Gomaji Vs Smt. Yasoda & Ors. Citation No. 1(1996) DMC 487; II (1996) DMC 469.

 

14. Working wife no maintenance in HMA 24, 125 CrPC only for child. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl JJ. T. Chatterjee and H. Dattu, order on 23 March 2009, Civil Appeal Nos. 1789-1790 of 2009, SLP (C) Nos. 24589-24590 of 2007, Anu Kaul Vs Rajeev Kaul. Citation Nos. (2009) INSC 582 (23 March 2009); (2009) 13 SCC 209.

 

15. Meaning of unable to maintain in 125 CrPC and grounds for maintenance. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl J. Dr. Arijit Pasayat, order on 27-11-2007, Appeal Cr. 1627 of 2007 arising on SLP No. (Crl.) 4379 of 2006, Chaturbhuj Vs Sita bai. Citation Nos. (2008) 2 SCC 316; AIR 2008 SC 530; 2008 (I0 KLT 41 (SC).

 

16. Maintenance awarded in two sections is offset. (HC Punjab and Haryana), Coram Mr. J. S. D. Anand, order on 23-02-2010, Civil revision No. 2427 of 2009, Gian Chand Vs Dilpreet Kaur.

 

17. Liability of maintenance of children is co-extensive in 2:1 when both parents are working. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl J. D. P. Wadhwa, order 28-03-2000, AIR 2000 SC 1398, I (200) DMC 621, 2000 II OLR SC 85, Padmja Sharma Vs Ratan Lal Sharma. Citation No. (2000) 4 SCC 266.

 

18. Meaning to unable to maintenance. (Supreme Court), Bench, Hbl P. Sathasivam, J, .order 20 July 2011, Civil Appeal Nos. 5831-5833 of 2011, Arising SLP (C) Nos. 20518-20520 of 2009, Vinny Parmar Vs Paramvir. Citation No. AIR 2011 SC 2748; (2011) 7 SCALE 741.

 

19. No maintenance to earning spouse. (HC Delhi), Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order on 18-09-2008, CM (M) 949/ 08, Manish Kumar Vs Pratibha.

 

20. No maintenance if wife lies. (SC), Bench Hbl JJ.. G. S. Singhvi and Ashok Kumar Ganguli, order on 03-12-2009, Civil Appeal No. 5239 of 2009, Dalip Singh Vs State of Up and Ors. Citation No. (2010) 2 SCC 114.

 

21. Reduced interim maintenance. (SC), Hbl J. R. M. Lodha, order on 20-07-2010, Appeal No. 5660 of 2010, Arising SLP (C) No. 6736 of 2007, Neeta Rakesh Jain Vs Rakesh Jeetmal Jain. Citation No. AIR 2010 SC 3540; (2010) 12 SCC 242; 2010 (7) JT I 76 (SC).

 

22. Wife is not entitled to maintenance who deserted her husband. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl JJ. S. Ahmed & D. Wadhwa, order on 02-03-200, AIR 2000 SC 952, 2000(2) ALD Cri 15, 2000Cr. LJ 1498, Rohtash Singh Vs Smt. Ramendrei & Ors. Citation No. (2000) 3 SCC 180; JT 2000 (2) SC 553.

 

23. Maintenance not granted as it is proved that wife wants to reside separately. No maintenance to deserting wife. (HC Chhattisgarh), Hbl J., L. C. Bhadoo, order on 15 -02-2004, Crl. Revision No. 544/2003, Shiv Kumar Yadav Vs Santoshi Yadav.

 

24. Husband can get PF details of wife. (CIC, Delhi), Decision No. 1816/ IC (A) 2008, F No. CIC/MA/A/2007/00583, Prof M.M. Ansari, order on 10 Jan 2008.

 

25. Wife guilty of contempt of court, maintenance denied with cost. (HC Delhi), Hbl J. S. N. Dhingra, order on 25-01-2010, Cont. Case (C) 482 of 2008, Gurbinder Singh Vs Manjit Kaur.

 

26. Children have to maintain their parents. (High Court Gujrat), Hbl J. Akhil Kureshi, order on 09-02-2011, CR RA/759 of 2009, 4/4, Hasmukhbhai Narayan Bhai Viramiya Vs State & Ors.

 

27. Conditions when maintenance to be paid. (High Court Delhi), Mr. Pradeep Nandrajog J., order reserved on 02-04-2007, order on 14-04-2007, CM (M) No. 367 of 2007, Alok Kumar Jain Vs Purnima Jain. Citation No. 2007 (96) DRJ 115.

 

28. All states amends in Sec 125 CrPC is invalid. (SC), Bench Hbl M. Katju, Gyan Sudha Mishra JJ., order on 11 Jan 2011, Crl Appeal No. 107 of 2011, SLP (Crl) No. 6568 of 2009, Manoj Yadav Vs Pushpa Yadav. Citation No. 2011 : 1 L.W. (Crl.) 520.

 

29. Wife should clear that she is unable to maintain her. No maintenance to enable wife who deserted her husband. (High Court Karnataka), Bench Hbl J. M. Patil, order on 13-02-1980, Haunsabai Vs Balkrishna Krishna Badigar. Citation Nos. 1981 Cri LJ 110; ILR 1980 KAR 612; 1980 (2) Kar LJ 158.

 

30. Maintenance on actual earning. (High Court Delhi), Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order reserved 25-07-2008, order on 18-09-2008, CM (M) No. 1790 of 2006 and CM No. 1435 of 2006, Ritu Raj Kant Vs Anita. Citation No. 154 (2008) DLT 505.

 

31. Maintenance denied for working wife. (High Court Madras), Hbl A. S. Venkatachalamoorthy J., order on 21-06-2002, Kumaresan Vs Aswathi. Citation No. (2002) 2 MLJ 760.

 

32. No maintenance for capable and working wife. (High Court Maharastra), Hbl J. C. Chitre J., order on 24-03-2000, Smt. Mamta Jaiswal Vs Rajesh Jaiswal. Citation No. 2000 (4) MPHT 457; II (2000) DMC 170.

 

33. No maintenance to earning wife, only to children. (High Court Karnataka), Hbl K. Manjunath J., order on 22-08-2005, AIR 2005 Kant 417, ILR 2005 KAR 4981, Dr. E. Shanthi Vs Dr. H K. Vasudev.

 

34. No Maintenance to working wife in 125 CrPC. (High Court Madras), Hbl P. Sathasivam J., order on 21-01-2003, Manokaran @ Ramamoorthy Vs M. Devaki. Citation Nos. AIR 2003 Mad 212; I (2003) DMC 799; (2003) I MLJ 752 (Mad), CMP No. 16264 of 2002.

 

35. No Maintenance to wife, but only to child. (HC Mumbai), Hbl J. B. L. Marlapalle, order on 18-7-2009, Appeal No. 20 of 2005 and 144 of 2005, Smt. Manju Kamal Mehra Vs Kamal Puskar Mehra. Citation Nos. 2010 AIR (Bom) 34; 2009 (5) AIIMR 798; Legal/  360.in 114983; LS/Bom/2009/1374.

 

36. No Maintenance to capable wife. (HC Delhi), Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order on 10-09-2008, CM (M) No. 539 of 2008, Vijay Kumar Vs Harsh Lata Aggarwal.

 

37. No maintenance U/s 125 CrPC when wife deserts hubby without cause and also she is earning. No Maintenance to capable wife, but only to child and no maintenance to wife living in adultery. (HC Uttaranchal), Hbl J. Alok Singh, order on 18-11-2009, Crl. Rev. No. 201 of 2006, Smt. Archana Gupta & ors Vs Rajeev Gupta.

 

38. Wife should clear that she is unable to maintain herself. (HC Allahabad), Hbl J. B. Katju, order on 25-03-1976, Manmohan Singh Vs Smt. Mahindra Kaur. Citation No. 1976 Cri LJ 1664.

 

39. No Maintenance if wife is working. (HC Uttaranchal), Hbl J. Dharamveer, order on 25-10-2010, Crl Rev. No. 88 of 2002, Vikas Jain Vs Deepali @ Ayushi. Citation No. LAWS (UTN) 2010-1-36.

 

40. Wife living separate troubled in family no maintenance. (HC Madras), Hbl J. P. R. Shiva Kumar, order on 22-02-2008, Crl. R. C. No. 1491 of 2005, Marimuthu Vs Janaki. Citation No. AIR 2003 Mad 212; I (2003) DMC 799; (2003) I MLJ 752.

 

41. No maintenance to wife who left her husband. (HC Mumbai), Hbl V. R. Kingaonkar J., order on 08-04-2008, Cri R.A. 226 of 2002, Sanjay Sudhkar Bhosle Vs Khristina. Citation No. 2008 (2) Bom. C.R. (Cri) 467.

 

42. No maintenance to deserted wife who denied to live with husband. (HC Gujarat), Hbl G. L. Gupta J., order on 22-01-1999, Crl. Rev. No. 179 of 1997, Crl P. C. 2 of 1974 S. 125, Bheeka Ram Vs Goma Devi & Ors.Citation No. 1999 CRLJ 1789.

 

43. No alimony to wife who deserted her husband. (HC Punjab and Haryana), Hbl Mohinder Pal J., order on 19-03-2009, Crl Misc No. M-24684 of 2008 (O&M), Poonam Vs Mahender Kumar.

 

44. Husband parent’s property should not be counted in maintenance. (High Court Delhi), Hbl J. Aruna Suresh, order on 02-07-2010, CM (M) No. 1045 of 2008 and C M No. 13003 of 2008, Sushila Devi Vs Joginder Kumar.

 

45. Permanent alimony cancelled. (HC Mumbai), Hbl JJ. A. P. Despande and Smt. R. P. Sondurbaldota, order on 08-04-2010, Appeal No. 116 of 2002, Family Court 47/ 2002, Arun Kashinath Despande Vs Inumati R. Deo.

 

46. Wife deserted her husband, no maintenance. (HC Mumbai), Hbl R. S. Mohite J. , order on 04-02-2005, Meena Dinesh Parmar Vs Dinesh H. Parmar. Citation Nos. AIR 2005 Bom 298; 2005 (4) Bom CR 672; 2005 (2) Mh LJ 305.

 

47. Wife living separate without reason no maintenance. (HC Kerala), Hbl M. Sashidharan Nambiar J., order on 03-12-2010, Crl MC No. 1893 of 2006, Manoshanthi & Ors Vs Ramachandran & State.

48. Wife living separate from husband not entitled for maintenance. (HC Delhi), Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order on 27-08-2010, Crl M C No. 491 of 2009, Sanjay Bhardwaj Vs State & Anr. Citation No. 2010 (118) DRJ 385.

 

49. Qualified wife should work for maintenance. (HC Delhi), Hbl J. Shiv Narayan Dhingra, order on 01-10-2008, CM (M) 1153 of 2008 (DEL) , Kavita Prasad Vs Ram Ashrey Prasad.

 

50. 125 CrPC is Civil in Nature. (Supreme Court), Hbl Dr. Arijit Pasayat J., order on 05-06-2007, Appeal (Crl.) 795 of 2001, Iqbal Bano Vs State of UP & Ors. Citation Nos. AIR 2007 SC 2215; (2007) 6 SCC 785; 2007 AIR SWC 3880; (2007) 3 SCC (Cri) 258; Cr LR (SC) 554.

 

51. NBW cannot be issued for nonpayment of maintenance. (HC Kerala), Hbl J. Sashidharan Nambiar, order on 10-12-2010, Crl MC No. 4843 of 2010, Shanvas Vs Raseena & State of Kerala.

 

52. Magistrate can grant interim maintenance. (Supreme Court), Bench Hbl JJ. Venkataramiah E.S.T., Mishra R.B., order on 09-10-1985, Savitri Vs Govind Singh Rawat. Citation Nos. 1986 AIR SC 984; 1985 SCC (4) 337; 1985 SCALE (2) 697.

 

53. Wife’s property, income sources must be considered in CrPC 125. Also the order of maintenance if made to pay from date of application, need not record the reason for doing so. In general it is payable from date of order. (SC) Hbl C.K. Thakker, and D. K. Jain , JJ. Order on 28 July 2008, Civil Appeal No. 4666 of 2008, Shail Kumari Devi & Anr Vs Krishan Bhagwan Pathak @ Kishun B. Pathak. Citation No. AIR 2008 SC 3006; (2008) 9 SCC 632; 2008 (3) ALT (Crl) 171 (SC).

 

54. No maintenance in the Domestic Violence Act 2005, 125 CrPC is applicable. (HC Bombay), Nagpur Hbl M. L. Tahaliyani J. , Order on May 05, 2014. WP No. 32 of 2014, Koushik Vs Sau Sangeeta Koushik and Ors.

 

55. Wife fined 2 Lakhs wrt DV Act proceedings for “making mockery of the judicial process”, Contempt and for suppression of facts. (HC Delhi), Hbl J. Vipin Sanghi, reserved on 20-12-2011 Order on 21-02-2012, CONT, CAS (C) 815/2011 and C.M. No. 20360/2011, Douglas Breckenridge Vs Jhilmil Breckenridge.

 

56. Maintenance in 125 CrPC from the date of order. (HC Calcutta), Hbl J, Ashim Kumar Roy, Order on 05-03-2010, C.R.R. No. 257 of 2005, Sudarshan Agarwal Vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. Citation No. LS/Cal 2010/265.

 

57. Not doing cross examination of other witness on one pretext to other, punished with cost of Rs. 25,000/- with warning. (HC Delhi), Hbl, J, S.N. Dhingra, Order on March 09, 2010, CM (M) No. 496/2009, Rampyari & Ors. Vs Ms. Kamlesh.

 

58. Steps made for the trial Courts while dealing with the civil trials. Punishment imposed Rs. 2 Lakhs on producing false documents, concealment of the facts and false & fabricated frivolous litigation to get wrongdoers benefits. (SC), Hbl JJ, Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, date of Order July, 4, 2011, Civil Appeal Nos. 4912 -4913 of 2011, Arising SLP (C) Nos. 3157-31-58 of 2011, Ramrameshwari Devi and Ors. Vs Nirmala Devi and Ors. Citation Nos. (2011) 8 SCC 249; 2011(6) SCALE 677; JT 2011 (8) SC 90; 2011 AIR SCW 4000; 2011 (4) Supreme 625.

 

59. HC on double jeopardy, Article 20(2) of Constitution of India specifies that a person once trialed for an offence cannot be made to trial for same or some other offence on same set of fact and for same cause of actions. The same is termed as Double Jeopardy in criminal cases and Section 300 covers it in civil cases. (HC Madras) Madurai Bench, Coram Hbl J, V. Periya Karuppiah, date of Order 28/04/2009, Crl.O.P.(MD) No.11066 of 2008 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2009, K. Kamala & Anr. Vs M.Parimala & Ors. Citation No. 2009 (3) MLJ (Crl) 450.

 

60. No alimony to wife who deserted her husband. (SC) Uphold decision of HC Punjab and Haryana. Revision petition Dismissed. Hbl JJ V. S. Sirpurkar and Sudarshan Reddy, Order on 16-11-2009, SPL CRL MP No (s) 18899, Poonam Vs Mahender Kumar.

 

61. Wife shall be entitled to claim maintenance under one of the two orders of the Magistrate under Section 125 CrPC and the District Judge, under Section 24 HMA Act respectively and it would be for her to choose as to which of the two orders she wants to enforce. ( HC Haryana and Punjab). Hbl G.S. Chahal, Order on 25-09-1991, Paramjit Kaur Vs Surinder Singh. Citation No. (1992) 101 PLR 155.

 

62. This reasoning of the learned Chief Justice appeals to us.
We are concerned with the Code which is complete on the topic and any defence against and order passed under section 125 Crl.P.C. must be founded on a provision in the Code. Section 125 CrPC is a provisionto protect the weaker of the two parties, namely, the neglected wife. If an order for maintenance has been made against the deserter it will operate until vacated or altered in terms of the provisions of the Code itself. If the husband has a case under Section 125 (4) (5) or section 127 of the Code it is open to him to initiate appropriate proceedings.
But until the original order for maintenance is modified or cancelled by a higher Court or is varied or vacated in terms of section 125 (4) or (5) or section 127, its validity survives. It is enforceable and no plea that there has been cohabitation in interregnum or that there has been a compromise between the parties can hold good as a valid defence. (SC) Bench Hbl JJ Krishna Iyer , V.R., Shingal, P.N., and Sen, A.P., Review Petition No. 95 of 1978; Order on 13-11-1978.

Bhupinder Singh Vs Daljit Kaur. Citation No. 1979 AIR 442, 1979 SCR (2) 292, 1979 SCC (3) 352

TEP (Tax Evasion Petition) - Against 498a Complaints/FIR

Sample Tax Evasion Petition

 
Dated: ____ (day),_____ (month) 2012 / 3  / 4 (year)

THE CHIEF COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX _______________
____________________BUILDING
____________________ROAD _________________
____________________(CITY)
____________________STATE
________PIN_CODE________


Dear Sir/ Madam

A. TAX EVASION PETITION AGAINST THE UNDERMENTIONED
(1) Mr. __Father-in-law___ Son/O Mr. _______________, Resident /Of ___________
(2) Mrs. __Mother-in-law____ Wife/O Mr. _____________, R/O ________________
(3) Mrs. ___Wife__________ D/O Mr. __________ , R/O ______________________
(4) Mr. _____Brother-in-law________ S/O Mr. ____________, R/O______________

B. REQUEST FOR PROVIDING DETAILS OF NET TAXABLE INCOME OF THE UNDERMENTIONED TO THE APPLICANT UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 (UNDER SECTION 6 OF THE ACT)
(1) Mr. ____________ Son/O Mr. _______________, Resident /Of ________________________
(2) Mrs. ___________ Wife/O Mr. _____________, R/O __________________________
(3) Mrs. _____________ D/O Mr. __________ , R/O _____________________________
(4) Mr. _____________ S/O Mr. ____________, R/O____________________

With reference to the captioned matter it is humbly submitted for your kind consideration:
1. My wife, Mrs. __________ d/o Mr. ___________ has filed fraudulent cases of dowry harassment and Domestic Violence against me. She is claiming that out of her father's earning and accumulation, Mr. ___father-in-law___________ had spent over Rs. /- (Rupees Lacs) in the marriage of ________ (wife’s name) with myself, _______(husband’s name) ________, on _______(date_)_______. She has also stated that Out of these expenses Rs. /- (Rupees Lacs) were given as cash for me and her in the marriage. Rest of the money was spent on the arrangements of the marriage. The same has been stated before the protection officer Mrs. ____(name of protection office) _______ and Mrs. __(name of protection office)___________ in a Domestic incidence report dated ___________ (date)

2. It is also claimed that Mr. ___________(father in law) _ spent over Rs. /- (Rupees______ ) in the marriage of his son Mr. _________ on _______________.

3. It is further claimed in the FIR that Mr. _______________ (father in law) gave large no. of articles including a ___________car bearing registration no to applicant as dowry.

4. It is further claimed in the affidavit dated by Mrs. _____[wife]________that during her delivery which took place at her father Mr. ___________________ house, expenditure of Rs. _____00,000/-(Rupees _______Lacs) took place which was incurred by Mr. __________[FIL ]_____________

5. It can be inferred from the above allegations that Mr. ___________father in law _________has spent over Rs. /- (Rupees ______Lacs) in the financial year 2010-2011 on the marriage of his daughter Mrs. _______ (wife) and his son Mr. _______ brother in law _________ within span of _____(number of ) days / weeks. He further spent Rs. /- (Rupees Lac) during Mrs. ___(wife’s) delivery in financial year 2011-12.

6. Beyond the same, Mr. _________father in law________ is the lawful owner of a house admeasuring _____ Sq Yard in ________________ , has a factory ________, ___city_____ and some _____(#s) Acres of Land in _______ (village / thesil / taluk ) in __________

7. And it is common knowledge that he owns ______ #s of residential plots in ____city and neighborhood are in the name of his wife, Mrs. _______and daughters Mrs. ________ and Ms. __________ and few other Benami properties.

8. It has been averred many a times that he also owns 2-3 lockers in various banks, has multiple savings accounts. He is owner of one SUV ____brand model ______bearing registration no , an _____ car, a _______ motorbike.

9. It is also averred that Mr. ___Father-in law , Mrs. ____Mother-in-law____ , Mr. _____brother-in-law________ and Mrs. _____wife______ have accounts in State Bank of _______, , HDFC Bank , ICICI bank, YES BANK , and Punjab National Bank and other banks.

10. Mr. ___father in law _____has savings bank accounts in . The total volumes of transactions in these accounts have been Rs. (Rupees ) and Rs /- (Rupees ) from financial year 2009-2010 to 2012-2013.

11. Mrs. Mother-in-law has one savings bank account in . The total Volume of transactions in the captioned account has been Rs. ______ (Rupees ________ ) from financial year 2009-2010 to 2012-2013.Her PAN No is .

12. Mr. brother-in-law has one savings bank account in . The total Volume of transactions in the captioned account has been Rs. /-(Rupees ) from financial year 2009-2010 to 2012-2013.His PAN No is .

13. It requires to be ascertained whether Mr. father-in-law, Mrs. _____mother__in___law____, Mr. _____brother__in___law____ and Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____ have disclosed their income and source from where they managed to acquire so many assets.

14. In case investigations are instituted through local authorities, it will enable to unearth huge revenues from father-in-law, Mrs. _____mother__in___law____, Mr. _____brother__in___law____ and Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____. I, therefore, request you to kindly make proper enquiry in this case. The PAN NO of Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____ is .

15. To the best of my knowledge Mr. father-in-law ______is involved in such-and-such-business from ____city_of__FIL__MIL__etc to outside India, an income tax payer and based on the allegations leveled against me and common knowledge, it can be inferred that he along with his family has been evading Income Tax and Wealth Tax for many years now causing loss to the exchequer of many Lacs per annum..

16. It is also common knowledge that Mr.____father-in-law_____ as earlier penalized for violation of _____________________ ACT, 1999.

17. It is further requested to be ascertained whether Non-resident Indian status claimed by Mr. father-in-law is valid under provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Section 6 of the Act) and Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (Section 2 of the Act).His Passport NO is ___________________

18. Mr.___father-in-law____ s a hoarder of money and his greed of money is so huge that he along with his family is the main instigator of spoiling my married life. He has been harassing me and extracting money from me on various occasions on one pretext or the other ever since my marriage by threatening to file multifarious litigations against me. It was only when I showed helplessness in providing him with more money on a regular basis that they filed this FIR and various maintenance suits against me to extract money from me through legal terrorism.

19. It is further submitted that as per the records available at https://incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in the website which is run by Honorable Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue, New Delhi) the jurisdiction for Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____’s PAN i.e. , the jurisdiction for Mr. ___brother_in_law’s PAN i.e. and jurisdiction for Mrs. _____mother__in___law____’s PAN i.e. .

By the way of this application UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 (UNDER SECTION 6 OF THE ACT),May I request to inform me the following:

a. Whether the under mentioned are Income Tax Assessees

(1) Mr. father-in-law S/O Mr. _______, R/O ___Residence_of_FIL_MIL_BIL_SIL____etc___, ____city_of__FIL__MIL__etc.

(2) Mrs. _____mother__in___law____ W/O Mr. father-in-law , R/O ___Residence_of_FIL_MIL_BIL_SIL____etc___, ____city_of__FIL__MIL__etc.

(3) Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____ D/O Mr. father-in-law , R/O ___Residence_of_FIL_MIL_BIL_SIL____etc___, ____city_of__FIL__MIL__etc.

(4) Mr. ___brother in law ____ S/O Mr. father-in-law , R/O ___Residence_of_FIL_MIL_BIL_SIL____etc___, ____city_of__FIL__MIL__etc

b. If they are Income Tax assessees, have they been filing their Income Tax Returns on a regular basis?

c. Please provide me with the certified copies details of Net taxable income of the above mentioned (4 of them) from the period 2001-02 to 2011-12.

d. What action your esteemed department is initiating against Mr. father-in-law, Mrs. _____mother__in___law____, Mr. ___brother_in_law_____ and Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____ in view of this petition to recover the dues of Income Tax.

e. Whether Mr. father-in-law is Non resident Indian under the provisions of Income tax act or Foreign exchange management act.

Also enclosed is the Judgment of Honorable Justice S. N. Dhingra which has relevance to the first part of my application. The same notes: “Now-a-days, exorbitant claims are made about the amount spent on marriage and other ceremonies and on dowry and gifts. In some cases claim is made of spending crores of rupees on dowry without disclosing the source of income and how funds flowed. I consider time has come that courts should insist upon disclosing source of such funds and verification of income from tax returns”

Also enclosed is the Judgment of Honorable Justice S Ravindra Bhat of Delhi High Court and CIC (Central Information Commission) order to release I.T. return information to the victims of dowry harassment, which has relevance to the second part of my application. It was held in Appeal no. CIC/LS/A/2010/001044-DS decided on 24/03/2011 by Honourable Central Information Commission: 17. In light of the above view taken by the Apex Court, I am inclined to make an observation in this case. I have already discussed the settled point of law regarding public interest but it is in the pursuance of the principle of that public interest only where we feel that the information pertaining to net taxable income of an assessee for the period of year 2000 till date be furnished by following the Section 10 of the RTI Act to his Income Tax Returns.

I request you to kindly take cognizance of these judgments and orders and provide me with relevant information while simultaneously initiating the action for recovery of dues from Mr. father-in-law, Mrs. _____mother__in___law____, Mr. _____brother__in___law____ and Mrs. _____srimiathi__wifee_____.

In case your esteemed office is unable to meet my request, I would like to know the detailed reasons as to why such information is being denied to me. The applicant might be constrained to file a further RTI application, if the information sought is denied without any valid reason.

Your prompt reply in this regard shall be highly appreciated.

Thanking you in advance.

Yours Faithfully,

___Husband ___

Annexure:

a. Copy of the FIR and the list of dowry articles

b. Copies of affidavits and Domestic Incident Report

c. Judgments of Honorable Justice S. N. Dhingra and Justice S Ravindra Bhat of Delhi High Court

d. CIC (Central Information Commission), orders to release I.T. return information.

e. Photocopy of earlier Postal Order No _____________.

f. Postal Order No ________________

CC:

a. Director General of Income Tax (Investigation), ______ state_____

b. Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, ______ state_____

d. Member, I.T. Investigation, Ministry of Finance

e. Finance Minister of India, Ministry of Finance

International Men's Day 19 Nov - Twitter Awakening

International Men's Day - 19 Nov

 

Few of us may think that it is just 1 more celebration day by those Greeting Cards Companies.

‎IMD is our identity. It is our day. It is the day that we celebrate Men.

 

Remember, we have graduated from just being victims of Law Misuse. We are the Crusaders of Men's Rights. Everything that we are doing is History in Making, Future defining.

 

Do you want to be the part of this change? India MRM is known worldwide for it's passion, direction and achievements.

 

It's time to keep the Flag High. Time to start waking the Twitter world to buckle-up for IMD.

Here is the Ammunition for the Twitter Awakening:

When: Starts on, 19/Nov/2016
Time: 10AM IST

                                 

Let's rock for IMD.

PS: for chapters which are running local twitter # as well, try to add both local and announced Hashtag for maximum coverage and Retweets.

 

Entire themselves in pursuit of happiness of their kids and family Happy #MensDay19Nov

true index of a man's character is his love for his family Happy #MensDay19Nov

Issues with physical & mental tend to have lethal consequences for men coz V r so reticent to talk @ #MensDay19Nov Don't let d men u have in your life go away from U, importance of men in your life can break U in tough times #MensDay19Nov Whether we want to believe it or not, we need family & relationships to thrive, Men r humans too #MensDay19Nov Man in your life supports u as Father, Brother, Friends respect Men's Happy #MensDay19Nov Why, not speak up?

 

Why u hesitate to say #MensDay19Nov Unfortunately men grossly misunderstood and undermined, they r Humans too #MensDay19Nov MEN R integral part of the society, Do not walkover them d truth is that we all need them.

 

#MensDay19Nov  Society only talks about Women today, why not men? why hate Men? #MensDay19Nov Men to work in worst conditions for family, society but at last get ignored by all, Men R Humans too #MensDay19Nov If all R Equal, none R above law then Y special Privileges in name of Empowerment.

 

Be on par #MensDay19Nov Talk about Men, their Issues, their gain, their contributions, their needs, give them love Happy #MensDay19Nov Happy #MensDay19Nov to all son, brother, father, grandfather, uncle, friend & in more roles they come Moment you put feminist on a pedestal they will look down upon you.

 

Trick is equality. #MensDay19Nov With life at stake U won't find feminist to come forward to say, Happy #MensDay19Nov What is dangerous about feminists is not what they say about their cause, but what they say about men. #MensDay19Nov

 

There is not a greater loss than the loss of one's self-respect. Happy #MensDay19Nov

Men not concerned with your liking or disliking. All they ask is equality Happy #MensDay19Nov

 

A true gentleman is one that refuses apologizes when he has not offended a lady intentionally Happy #MensDay19NovView hardships of men. #MensDay19Nov One of the most sincere forms of respect is actually listening to what another has to say. #MensDay19Nov Natures of law says equality in diversity Happy #MensDay19Nov.

'Indian laws do not protect men'

'A false promise of marriage cannot be called rape.'
'The police register it as rape. But you are acquitted finally.'
'In the meantime the man's name is spoilt.'
'Feminism today is spreading hatred towards men.'
'Feminism has destroyed the harmony in society, in the family and in the work place.'
'It has destroyed the trust between men and women.'

Swarup Sarkar is a crusader for men's rights.
A founder of Save the Family, below, left, the textile engineer spoke to Rediff.com's A Ganesh Nadar about men's rights and how his organisation helps 'men in distress.'

When did Save the Family start?
Save the family started as a movement on March 10, 2005. I was one of the members.
At that time when a girl complained about dowry -- people advised the husband to pay and settle.
We decided to fight the cases. We also decided to set up a helpline for others with similar problems.

What kind of cases did you come across in the beginning?
There were so many cases. We were 12 members at that time. All of us were facing cases.
It was like extortion -- divorce and dowry cases.
After the members increased to 250, we registered it as a NGO -- the Save Family Foundation.
After that we filed a PIL in the Supreme Court to scrap Section 498 (the Dowry Act). The court refused and told us to approach the government.
We approached the Rajya Sabha. They refused to scrap the Act but agreed to some guidelines to prevent misuse of the Act in 2012.

Could you tell me about what you call false rape charges?
People started noticing us after 2007. Earlier a medical test was essential for making a rape allegation. Now it is not essential before registering an FIR.
This is a loophole that has come up after the Delhi gang rape case. We had opposed this. Lots of false cases have been registered after that.
We want an FIR after a medical test.
A false promise of marriage cannot be called rape. Police register it as rape. But you are acquitted finally. In the meantime the man's name is spoilt.
Suppose a girl refuses to marry a boy after having an affair with him. You don't call her a rapist.
Every sexual relationship cannot be termed as rape.

You think a central welfare body for men will help?
There is no government organization for men. We want a national commission for men.
Unfair laws cannot bring gender equality. Laws should be gender neutral.

There should be special laws to prevent misuse of dowry and rape laws.

Do you have many women members?
Seventy per cent of the calls to our helpline are made by women who are supporting men in distress.
We coax them to tell the men to call directly. We have a lot of women supporters.
There is a helpline that works for all 24 hours. It is a single number for the whole country -- 8882 498498.
40 NGOs all over India are connected to this helpline. We provide counseling too.
We have one national meeting every year on August 15. At that meeting we decide our strategy for the next year.
Our aim is to create awareness in society, and for that we hold seminars, protests and rallies.
We also make representations to lawmakers, the judiciary, politicians and the police. We are drafting a law to protect men and also make laws gender neutral.

How many members are there in your organization?
We have 7,500 registered members.

How is the group funded?
It is a self supported group. We don't charge victims. We get sponsors for our events.
We get small amounts as donations from the common people. It is enough for us. We spend our own money.
90 per cent of what we spend is our own money and 10 per cent is from donations.

How do men in distress get in touch with you?
They can call our helpline. They can attend our weekly meetings -- many victims come there. They can also send us an e-mail.

How many men in distress contact you in a month?
On an average we receive 100 calls per day from all over the country. This means 3,000 in a month.
About one lakh (100,000) men contact us every month which includes direct visits and also those who contact us by e-mail.

Do you have lawyers as members?
We don't have lawyers as members. We don't recommend lawyers to the victims who contact us.

Do you think male sexuality is misunderstood?
The law is like that. If a girl beats you up, there is no case, they have a licence to beat up men.
Unfair laws are the reason. In other countries work place harassment is gender neutral.
Indian laws do not protect men when men and women are involved.
Sexual crimes against men is not registered as a crime.

Do you think feminism clashes with the rights of men?
Feminism today is spreading hatred towards men.
Feminism has destroyed the harmony in society, in the family and in the work place.
It has destroyed the trust between men and women. That is why crime is going up.
When you spread hatred, violence and crimes increase.

RTI (hindi format) for caw or women cell.

सेवा में,
             जन सूचना अधिकारी,
             (विभाग/कार्यालय का पता),
             जिला का नाम:-
             राज्य का नाम:-
             पिन कोड:-

विषय:-  सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 6(1) और 6(3) के अन्तर्गत सूचना प्रदान करने हेतु।

श्रीमान जी,
               मैं(अपना नाम)[मकान नंबर xxx],{कालोनी का नाम}(शहर)का निवासी हूँ।मेरी पत्नी(पत्नी का नाम)ने महिला सेल(शहर जहाँ आपकी पत्नी ने दरखास्त दी थी)में एक दरखास्त संख्या xxx,दिनांक zz-zz-zzzz दी थी।जो आपके कार्यालय के अंतर्गत आती है।मुझे सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 के अन्तर्गत निम्नलिखित सूचना प्रदान करें:-

(1)   मेरी पत्नी(पत्नी का नाम)ने जो दरखास्त महिला सेल(शहर जहाँ आपकी पत्नी ने दरखास्त दी थी)में दी थी उसकी प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(2)   मेरी पत्नी(पत्नी का नाम)ने जो भी दस्तावेज अपनी दरखास्त के साथ संलग्न किये,उसकी प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(3)   मेरी पत्नी(पत्नी का नाम) और मेरे द्वारा जो उपस्थिति हस्ताक्षर किये गए,उस उपस्थिति पत्रक की प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(4)   मेरी पत्नी(पत्नी का नाम)द्वारा जो स्त्रीधन सूची दी गयी,उसकी प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(5)   मेरे द्वारा जो भी दस्तावेज दिए गए इस मामले(केस)में,उसकी प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(6)   मेरे द्वारा जो भी लिखित उत्तर दिए गए इस पूरे मामले में उन सब की प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(7)   मेरी पत्नी(पत्नी का नाम)द्वारा जो भी लिखित उत्तर दिए गए उनकी प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
(8)   जाँच अधिकारी या सम्बंधित अधिकारी द्वारा बनायीं गयी रिपोर्ट या अंतिम जाँच प्रतिवेदन की प्रमाणित प्रतिलिपि प्रदान करें।
                      अगर यह सूचना आपके कार्यालय के अन्तर्गत नहीं आती है तो सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 6(3) के अन्तर्गत आप इस निवेदन/प्रार्थना पत्र को सम्बंधित कार्यालय में पहुँचाने की कृपया करें।और इसकी सूचना भी लिखित तौर पर मुझे भेजें ताकि उस सम्बंधित कार्यालय से अगर मुझे जवाब न आये तो मैं उस सम्बंधित कार्यालय में प्रथम अपील कर सकूँ।
                                 मैं इस प्रार्थना पत्र के साथ सूचना प्रदान करने हेतु फीस डाक सम्बन्धी विधि(पोस्टल आर्डर)नंबर xxx,दिनांक zz-zz-zzzz,मूल्य yyरुपये के रूप में संलग्न कर रहा हूँ।
                             कृपया करके जल्द से जल्द तीस दिन के अन्दर मुझे सूचना प्रदान करने की कृपा करें।मैं आपका अति आभारी रहूँगा।
                    सह धन्यवाद।
आपका
(अपने हस्ताक्षर)
अपना नाम,
मकान नंबर:-
कालोनी:-
शहर:-
जिला:-
राज्य:-
पिन कोड:-
मोबाइल नंबर:-
दिनांक आज की:-

भावनात्मक लेख झूठे दहेज़ पर

 

*“ मैंने दहेज़ नहीं माँगा ”*
साहब मैं थाने नहीं आउंगा,
अपने इस घर से कहीं नहीं जाउंगा,
माना पत्नी से थोडा मन मुटाव था,
सोच में अन्तर और विचारों में खिंचाव था,
*पर यकीन मानिए साहब ,*
*“ मैंने दहेज़ नहीं माँगा ”*

 

मानता हूँ कानून आज पत्नी के पास है,
महिलाओं का समाज में हो रहा विकास है।
चाहत मेरी भी बस ये थी कि माँ बाप का सम्मान हो,
उन्हें भी समझे माता पिता, न कभी उनका अपमान हो।
पर अब क्या फायदा, जब टूट ही गया हर रिश्ते का धागा,
*यकीन मानिए साहब,*
*“ मैंने दहेज़ नहीं माँगा ”*

 

परिवार के साथ रहना इसे पसंन्द नहीं,
कहती यहाँ कोई रस, कोई आनन्द नही,
मुझे ले चलो इस घर से दूर, किसी किराए के आशियाने में,
कुछ नहीं रखा माँ बाप पर प्यार बरसाने में,
हाँ छोड़ दो, छोड़ दो इस माँ बाप के प्यार को,
नहीं मांने तो याद रखोगे मेरी मार को,
बस बूढ़े माता पिता का ही मोह, न छोड़ पाया मैं अभागा,
*यकींन मानिए साहब,*
*“ मैंने दहेज़ नहीं माँगा ”*

 

फिर शुरू हुआ वाद विवाद माँ बाप से अलग होने का,
शायद समय आ गया था, चैन और सुकून खोने का,
एक दिन साफ़ मैंने पत्नी को मना कर दिया,
न रहुगा माँ बाप के बिना ये उसके दिमाग में भर दिया।
बस मुझसे लड़ कर मोहतरमा मायके जा पहुंची,
2 दिन बाद ही पत्नी के घर से मुझे धमकी आ पहुंची,
माँ बाप से हो जा अलग, नहीं सबक सीखा देगे,
क्या होता है दहेज़ कानून तुझे इसका असर दिखा देगें।
परिणाम जानते हुए भी हर धमकी को गले में टांगा,
*यकींन माँनिये साहब ,*
*“ मैंने दहेज़ नहीं माँगा ”*

 

जो कहा था बीवी ने, आखिरकार वो कर दिखाया,
झगड़ा किसी और बात पर था, पर उसने दहेज़ का नाटक रचाया।
बस पुलिस थाने से एक दिन मुझे फ़ोन आया,
क्यों बे, पत्नी से दहेज़ मांगता है, ये कह के मुझे धमकाया।
माता पिता भाई बहिन जीजा सभी के रिपोर्ट में नाम थे,
घर में सब हैरान, सब परेशान थे,
अब अकेले बैठ कर सोचता हूँ, वो क्यों ज़िन्दगी में आई थी,
मैंने भी तो उसके प्रति हर ज़िम्मेदारी निभाई थी।
आखिरकार तमका मिला हमे दहेज़ लोभी होने का,
कोई फायदा न हुआ मीठे मीठे सपने सजोने का।
बुलाने पर थाने आया हूँ, छूप कर कहीं नहीं भागा,
*लेकिन यकींन मानिए साहब ,*
*“ मैंने दहेज़ नहीं माँगा ”*

 

*झूठे दहेज के मुकदमों के कारण ,*
*पुरुष के दर्द से ओतप्रोत एक मार्मिक कृति…*
*दहेज की कई घरो की हकीकत है*